Compute infrastructure intelligence
Price the compute. Underwrite the power.
The two questions every AI infrastructure memo has to answer — what the compute costs, and whether the power will arrive — with sources you can check on both.
Publication requirements
Current method
- Methodology
- gci-v0.1.1
- Distinct venues
- ≥ 5
- Distinct sources
- ≥ 5
- Quote age
- ≤ 24h
- Outlier trim
- 3σ
- Provisional band
- > 15% excluded
- 394
- Cited facilities
- 7
- Research specialists
- 18
- Data API routes
40.87 GW across 32 countries. Archival snapshot, Epoch AI CC BY, 2025-08-23
Grid, assets, geopolitics, investment, contracts, and compute costs
Pricing, facilities, capacity, and reference data
The platform
Compare compute prices with the power constraints behind them.
Check a compute price, screen a site's power, and walk into review with the evidence already attached.
Compute Index
Limited dataCompare GPU-hour prices across providers, regions, and purchase terms.
Provider and regional comparisons
Learn morePower Diligence
Private previewScreen whether a site can be energized in time, against published region, development-stage, and constraint weights.
9 interconnection regions · 8 bottleneck classes
Learn moreSpecialist Agents
Private previewAsk a specialist about grid capacity, geopolitics, contracts, or compute costs. Every answer arrives with its sources.
Sources shown with each answer
Learn moreUnderwriting Tools
AvailableFree calculators for levelized cost of energy, datacenter payback, GPU-hour options, and gigawatts to revenue.
No account required
Learn moreData API & MCP
AvailableUse GreenCIO data through the API or from the assistant your analyst already has open.
18 API routes · 11 assistant tools
Learn moreWho it's for
Pick the desk that matches your mandate
Deal sourcing + diligence
Quantify grid constraints and permit risk before you price the deal.
Underwriting + credit risk
See how grid and regulatory shifts affect borrower performance before they hit covenants.
Portfolio risk + transition
Track probability-weighted transition risk and grid constraints across holdings.
How it works
From raw filing to defensible brief
Ingest
We pull filings, queue records, and market sources, and stamp each one with where it came from and when. Coverage follows what your deployment has switched on — and we show you that, rather than letting you assume.
Score
Each signal gets relevance, impact, and — where the evidence supports it — a probability with its reasoning attached. Until a measured track record exists, treat those fields as decision support. We do, and we say so.
Brief
You get a structured brief: the sources, the assumptions, a warning wherever the data ran thin, and an approval gate before anything consequential moves. When a provider is down, the brief says so instead of papering over it.
Without greencio
“We think the permit might be delayed.”
No probability. No confidence interval.
No way to model downstream impact.
Three hours just to find the filing.
Illustrative greencio output
“73% probability of approval by Q3, based on historical patterns and current queue position. If delayed, grid capacity probability drops from 67% to 41% across 3 regions.”
Quantified uncertainty. Conditional scenarios.
An example of the output format — not a customer result.
Stale demo intelligence
A labeled snapshot from the feed
This saved snapshot is not current. Article dates and source links remain visible.
Data sources
GreenCIO uses public filings, grid operator data, company reports, and licensed datasets. Read our methodology
Transport security
TLS for application traffic
SOC 2 readiness
Formal controls in progress
Tenant boundaries
Organization-scoped application paths
Scoped data access
Organization-aware APIs
Bring the decision you are stuck on.
Bring a site that needs power, a compute purchase that needs a price, or a portfolio question for committee review. We'll show you which modules apply — and name the evidence you're still missing.