Compute infrastructure intelligence
Price the compute. Underwrite the power.
Compare GPU-hour prices and assess the power constraints that affect AI infrastructure projects.
Publication requirements
Current method
- Methodology
- gci-v0.1.1
- Distinct venues
- ≥ 5
- Distinct sources
- ≥ 5
- Quote age
- ≤ 24h
- Outlier trim
- 3σ
- Provisional band
- > 15% excluded
GreenCIO publishes a result only when the source coverage and quality requirements are met.
- 394
- Cited facilities
- 7
- Research specialists
- 18
- Data API routes
40.87 GW across 32 countries. Archival snapshot, Epoch AI CC BY, 2025-08-23
Grid, assets, geopolitics, investment, contracts, and compute costs
Pricing, facilities, capacity, and reference data
The platform
Price discovery and power underwriting, in one place.
Compare compute prices, screen power availability, and prepare evidence for review.
Compute Index
Limited dataCompare GPU-hour prices across providers, regions, and purchase terms.
Provider and regional comparisons
Learn morePower Diligence
Private previewScreen whether a site can be energized in time, against published region, development-stage, and constraint weights.
9 interconnection regions · 8 bottleneck classes
Learn moreSpecialist Agents
Private previewResearch support for grid capacity, assets, geopolitics, investment, contracts, and compute costs.
Sources shown with each answer
Learn moreUnderwriting Tools
AvailableFree calculators for levelized cost of energy, datacenter payback, GPU-hour options, and gigawatts to revenue.
No account required
Learn moreData API & MCP
AvailableUse GreenCIO data through the API or from the assistant your analyst already has open.
18 API routes · 11 assistant tools
Learn moreWho it's for
Pick the desk that matches your mandate
Deal sourcing + diligence
Quantify grid constraints and permit risk before you price the deal.
Underwriting + credit risk
See how grid and regulatory shifts affect borrower performance before they hit covenants.
Portfolio risk + transition
Track probability-weighted transition risk and grid constraints across holdings.
How it works
The configured signal workflow
Ingest
Approved collectors can ingest selected filings, queue records, and market sources. Availability and freshness depend on the deployed source and storage configuration.
Score
Configured analysis can attach probability, confidence, entity, and impact fields. Those fields remain decision support—not demonstrated calibration— until the corresponding evidence history is operating and verified.
Brief
Approved users can review structured output with source trails, assumptions, degraded-data warnings, and human approval gates. Live availability still depends on the configured data and model providers.
Without greencio
“We think the permit might be delayed.”
No probability. No confidence interval.
No way to model downstream impact.
The analyst spent 3 hours finding the filing.
Illustrative greencio output
“73% probability of approval by Q3, based on historical patterns and current queue position. If delayed, grid capacity probability drops from 67% to 41% across 3 regions.”
Quantified uncertainty. Conditional scenarios.
Example only; no customer time-saved claim is implied.
Stale demo intelligence
A labeled snapshot from the feed
This saved snapshot is not current. Article dates and source links remain visible.
Data sources
GreenCIO uses public filings, grid operator data, company reports, and licensed datasets. Read our methodology
Transport security
TLS for application traffic
SOC 2 readiness
Formal controls in progress
Tenant boundaries
Organization-scoped application paths
Scoped data access
Organization-aware APIs
Bring the decision you are stuck on.
Bring a site that needs power, a compute purchase that needs a price, or a portfolio question for committee review. We will show which modules apply and identify the missing evidence.