Diligence map
Eight constraints. Each needs its own evidence.
These constraints can overlap. This map is a review index, not a forecast and not a claim that one stage causes the next.
Accelerator capacity
Can the selected accelerator SKU arrive in the required quantity and configuration?
Memory capacity and bandwidth
Does the proposed system fit the workload under measured operating conditions?
High-bandwidth memory supply
Which memory configuration is included in the deliverable system, and who has committed the supply?
Packaging, assembly, and test
Which manufacturing, packaging, assembly, and test steps can delay the finished system?
Power delivery
How much load can the serving utility deliver, under which tariff, and by what date?
Evidence to obtain
- Serving utility and effective tariff
- Requested, studied, contracted, and energized megawatts
- Executed agreements and dated study milestones
- Upgrade scope, cost allocation, deposits, and delay remedies
Decision effect
Land, generation announcements, and a queue position do not prove a service date. Use the utility record and signed obligations for the site.
Related review
Cooling and water
Can the cooling design operate at the proposed rack density under local climate and permit limits?
Network and interconnect
Can the cluster move data at the rate assumed by the workload model?
Workload and data evidence
Are the workload, data rights, quality threshold, and efficiency assumptions defined well enough to reproduce the result?
How to use the map
Define the decision
Name the site, system, workload, date, and approval being reviewed.
Open the records
Use dated quotes, contracts, studies, permits, and measured results.
Record the gap
Keep missing evidence and its owner next to the decision.
GreenCIO covers compute price and site power evidence
The public modules show the narrower review boundary for each result.
Review the evidence for your case
Bring a site, system, or workload decision. We will identify which records are present and which are still missing.