Diligence map

Eight constraints. Each needs its own evidence.

These constraints can overlap. This map is a review index, not a forecast and not a claim that one stage causes the next.

8 review areas4 evidence groupsEditorial map

Evidence to obtain

  • Serving utility and effective tariff
  • Requested, studied, contracted, and energized megawatts
  • Executed agreements and dated study milestones
  • Upgrade scope, cost allocation, deposits, and delay remedies

Decision effect

Land, generation announcements, and a queue position do not prove a service date. Use the utility record and signed obligations for the site.

How to use the map

Define the decision

Name the site, system, workload, date, and approval being reviewed.

Open the records

Use dated quotes, contracts, studies, permits, and measured results.

Record the gap

Keep missing evidence and its owner next to the decision.

GreenCIO covers compute price and site power evidence

The public modules show the narrower review boundary for each result.

Compute Index

Compare provider and regional GPU-hour records with source type and data date.

Power Diligence

Screen the site, interconnection stage, utility path, and unresolved constraints.

Intelligence Feed

Review selected market events with a source link and publication date.

Review the evidence for your case

Bring a site, system, or workload decision. We will identify which records are present and which are still missing.

Request a demoReview public signals