Why We Stopped Building a 'Platform'
Why we moved from traditional SaaS patterns to a multi-agent operating model for infrastructure intelligence.
Every time you train a large language model, you're consuming the equivalent of thousands of gallons of water for cooling. This isn't hypothetical - it's happening right now in datacenters across Virginia, Texas, and Arizona.
Let's break down the numbers:
Consider a typical large-scale training run:
That's 660,000 gallons. For one training run. And we're running thousands of these every month across the industry.
We're saying: let's get smarter about WHERE and WHEN we train.
Some operators are already doing this:
The problem is especially acute in water-stressed regions. Northern Virginia hosts over 70% of the world's internet traffic, but the Potomac River basin is already under stress. Arizona datacenters are expanding despite the state's ongoing drought.
Some utilities are pushing back. In 2024, several proposed data center projects were delayed or cancelled due to water availability concerns.
Moving compute to regions with abundant water and renewable energy. Iceland, Quebec, and Nordic countries are seeing increased interest not just for cheap power, but for sustainable cooling.
Training at night when temperatures are lower reduces cooling requirements by 10–20%. This also aligns with higher renewable penetration on the grid.
Liquid cooling and immersion cooling can reduce water consumption by up to 90% compared to traditional evaporative cooling towers.
Some facilities are investing in on-site water treatment to recycle cooling water multiple times before discharge.
For CIOs and infrastructure investors, water is becoming a material risk factor:
The AI infrastructure crisis isn't coming. It's already here.
The question isn't whether we'll need to change how we build and operate AI infrastructure. The question is whether you'll be ahead of the curve or scrambling to catch up.
What's your water strategy?
For more insights on sustainable AI infrastructure, subscribe to GreenCIO's weekly intelligence briefing.
Why we moved from traditional SaaS patterns to a multi-agent operating model for infrastructure intelligence.
How code-first skills and tighter context routing drove major cost reductions without quality loss.
Why grid-visibility tooling may become the limiting factor for AI data center expansion.
Where market-implied probabilities beat headlines for timing-sensitive energy and infrastructure decisions.
What the EU AI Act means for AI energy reporting, compliance timelines, and exposure management.
How structured disagreement between specialist agents produced better portfolio decisions.
Why LCOE remains a core metric for comparing technologies and underwriting long-horizon energy risk.
How carbon-aware workload scheduling reduces both emissions and compute cost volatility.
Inside our ingestion pipeline for extracting, scoring, and publishing infrastructure signals automatically.
A portfolio-level briefing on grid constraints, power costs, and capital-allocation implications.
Who is funding hyperscale buildout, where structures are changing, and what risk shifts to lenders.
A practical playbook for lowering AI energy intensity without sacrificing delivery speed.