Is your AI training cluster thirsty? Let's talk water.
A practical look at AI cooling water demand, where the risk concentrates, and how teams can mitigate it.
There's one number that matters for energy investing: LCOE.
Levelized Cost of Energy. $/MWh over the project lifetime.
It's how you compare:
Everything else is noise.
LCOE = Total Lifecycle Cost (NPV) / Total Lifetime Energy (NPV)That's it. Total cost divided by total energy, both discounted to present value.
| Parameter | Value |
|---|---|
| Technology | Solar PV |
| Capacity | 100 MW |
| CAPEX | $80,000,000 |
| Annual O&M | $800,000/year |
| Annual Generation | 200,000 MWh |
| Project Lifetime | 25 years |
| Discount Rate | 8% |
| Degradation | 0.5%/year |
Result: LCOE = ~$42/MWh
That's your target to beat. If another project has a higher LCOE, you need a good reason to choose it.
IRR tells you the return, but not whether the project is the best use of capital. LCOE tells you if you're producing energy efficiently.
NPV is scale-dependent. A 1GW project will have higher NPV than a 100MW project, but that doesn't mean it's more efficient. LCOE normalizes for scale.
Payback period ignores what happens after payback. A project that pays back in 5 years but produces expensive energy for 20 more years is worse than one that pays back in 7 years with cheap energy.
LCOE is sensitive to a few key inputs:
Understanding these sensitivities helps you assess project risk.
We built an open-source LCOE calculator that runs entirely in Python. No dependencies. Takes JSON in, gives analysis out.
It also does:
Try Our Free LCOE Calculator
Calculate the levelized cost of energy for any project. No signup required.
Open CalculatorIf you're evaluating energy projects and not leading with LCOE, you're doing it wrong.
Everything else is context. LCOE is the decision.
Use it, fork it, improve it. Our LCOE calculator is open source and free to use.
A practical look at AI cooling water demand, where the risk concentrates, and how teams can mitigate it.
Why we moved from traditional SaaS patterns to a multi-agent operating model for infrastructure intelligence.
How code-first skills and tighter context routing drove major cost reductions without quality loss.
Why grid-visibility tooling may become the limiting factor for AI data center expansion.
Where market-implied probabilities beat headlines for timing-sensitive energy and infrastructure decisions.
What the EU AI Act means for AI energy reporting, compliance timelines, and exposure management.
How structured disagreement between specialist agents produced better portfolio decisions.
How carbon-aware workload scheduling reduces both emissions and compute cost volatility.
Inside our ingestion pipeline for extracting, scoring, and publishing infrastructure signals automatically.
A portfolio-level briefing on grid constraints, power costs, and capital-allocation implications.
Who is funding hyperscale buildout, where structures are changing, and what risk shifts to lenders.
A practical playbook for lowering AI energy intensity without sacrificing delivery speed.